BaĆak Aray
UniversitĂ© Paris I â PanthĂ©on-Sorbonne, EXeCO (PHICO)
Efforts to establish an international auxiliary language (IAL) have a long history. Projects to overcome ethnic languages flourished in the 17th century Britain. Creators of these âphilosophical languagesâ (Descartes, Dalgarno, Wilkins, Leibniz) stressed the shift between the structure of spoken languages and the structure of nature, and consequently the view that the former leads to a distorted understanding of the latter. To replace imperfect natural languages â they are inefficient, at best, if not obviously misleading, so they claimed â they devoted their efforts to designing a transparent medium to represent the real structure of things adequately.
The history of the universal languages took a new turn towards the end of the 19th century. With Schleyerâs VolapĂŒk (1879) emerged a new goal for constructed languages: unlike their Enlightenment-era predecessors, the new constructed languages had a practical focus on international communication. Most of them integrated a posteriori elements in their grammar and vocabulary in order to maintain a continuity with natural languages, which ensured that they were more accessible to learners (Couturat and LĂ©au 1903: 113). This period may be characterized as a pragmatic turn. Epistemic ambitions of reflecting the real structure of things were discredited, and âuniversal languageâ was replaced by âinternational auxiliary languageâ. On the methodological side, conceptual analysis left its place to empirical observation of existing languages.
The new paradigm bore humanistic and cosmopolitan tendencies combined with a technophilia that inspired the extension of engineering to the linguistic field. Esperanto, the most emblematic â and, so far, most successful â IAL was accompanied by rhetoric from its creator, Zamenhof (1906: 1154), encouraging pacifism and promoting international brotherhood. The Delegation for the Adoption of International Auxiliary Language presented IAL as a historical necessity. In their history of the universal language, the leaders of the Delegation, Couturat and LĂ©au, mention the ongoing rapid globalization of the world as the background to the IAL (Couturat and LĂ©au 1903: VII). They explain this development by the exponential growth of transport and telecommunication technologies. These raised global mobility and revived international commerce, making the need for an IAL to facilitate international communication more important than ever. Read more ›