In the excellent Abralin ao vivo series of online lectures, there have recently been a number of contributions that deal with the history of linguistics. Here is a selection for your edification and entertainment.
James McElvenny
Typology and the history of linguistics
Gonçalo Fernandes, Rogelio Ponce de Leon Roméo, Alessandro Jocelito Beccari
Historiografia LinguĂstica
John Goldsmith
Where did generative grammar come from, anyway?
Ămilie AUSSANT et Jean-Michel FORTIS, ed. 2021. Historical journey in a linguistic archipelago: Descriptive concepts and case studies. Berlin : Language Science Press. (History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences, 3). 212 p. ISBN : 978-3-96110-292-1
Publisher’s website
This volume offers a selection of papers presented during the 14th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIV, Paris, 2017). Part I brings together studies dealing with descriptive concepts. First examined is the notion of âaccidensâ in Latin grammar and its Greek counterparts. Other papers address questions with a strong echo in todayâs linguistics: localism and its revival in recent semantics and syntax, the origin of the term âpolysemyâ and its adoption through BrĂ©al, and the difficulties attending the description of prefabs, idioms and other âfixed expressionsâ. This first part also includes studies dealing with representations of linguistic phenomena, whether these concern the treatment of local varieties (so-called patois) in French research, or the import and epistemological function of spatial representations in descriptions of linguistic time. Or again, now taking the word ârepresentationâ literally, the visual display of grammatical relations, in the form of the first syntactic diagrams. Part II presents case studies which involve wider concerns, of a social nature: the âfrom belowâ approach to the history of Chinese Pidgin English underlines the social roles of speakers and the diversity of speech situations, while the scrutiny of Lhomondâs Latin and French textbooks demonstrates the interplay of pedagogical practice, cross-linguistic comparison and descriptive innovation. An overview of early descriptions of Central Australian languages reveals a whole spectrum of humanist to positivist and antihumanist stances during the colonial age. An overarching framework is also at play in the anthropological perspective championed by Meillet, whose socially and culturally oriented semantics is shown to live on in Benveniste. The volume ends with a paper on Tráș§n Äức TháșŁo, whose work is an original synthesis between phenomenology and Marxist semiology, wielded against the âidealisticâ doctrine of Saussure.
Read more ›Organisation : Felix DE MONTETY (CNRS, Laboratoire Pacte, Grenoble, France) felix.de-montety@umrpacte.fr
Information : https://cartolangue.hypotheses.org/
This seminar aims at surveying the crossing trajectories of various scientific approaches to space and language, not only in geography and linguistics but also in history, anthropology and beyond. Its participants will propose to study how the tools of cartographical representation have been used and transformed over the past centuries to represent the spread and movement of language across specific territories, to look at the importance of naming processes in the making of place and identity, and explore some of the ways linguistic surveying can be translated from lived spaces to atlases.
Read more ›
The third book in the gold open access HPLS series has just appeared, Historical journey in a linguistic archipelago: Descriptive concepts and case studies, edited by Ămilie Aussant and Jean-Michel Fortis. The volume contains a selection of papers from the International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences XIV, which was held in Paris in 2017.
Get your free PDF copy from Language Science Press!
Ferdinand de SAUSSURE. 2020. Recueil des publications scientifiques de Ferdinand de Saussure. EditĂ© par Ch. Bally et L. Gautier, rĂ©vision dâA. Meillet. Reprise fac-similĂ© de lâĂ©dition de 1921. Limoges : Lambert-Lucas. 656 p. ISBN : 978-2-35935-331-0
Publisher’s website
Voici tous les textes Ă©crits par Saussure, signĂ©s par Saussure et publiĂ©s par Saussure, repris en 1921 dans un recueil posthume exhaustif par Charles Bally et LĂ©opold Gautier â rĂ©visĂ© par Antoine Meillet. Ce recueil entrait, en son temps, dans la mĂȘme intention scientifique que la publication du Cours de linguistique gĂ©nĂ©rale. Pour lâĂ©diteur dâaujourdâhui, il sâagit dâachever de rendre disponible en librairie lâessentiel de ce quâil faut avoir lu du maĂźtre de GenĂšve.
Read more ›
Patrick Flack
University of Fribourg
Over the last decade or so, we have been treated to a steady succession of book-length publications dedicated to the intellectual legacy of Roman Jakobson. This near continuous stream started with the release of the long-awaited volume 9/2 (part I & II) of Jakobson’s Selected Writings (ed. Toman 2012â13), quickly followed by the massive 4-volume Roman Jakobson anthology of critical essays in the series Critical assessments of leading linguists (Thomas 2014). Up next came a number of proceedings from conferences held respectively in Olomouc, Moscow and Milano/Vercelli: Roman O. Jakobson: a work in progress (KubiÄek & Lass 2014), Jakobson Today [Jakobson segodnja] (Avtonomova 2015) and Roman Jakobson, linguistics and poetics [Roman Jakobson, linguistica e poetica] (Esposito, Sini & Castagneto 2018). To these were added an Italian monography, Roman Jakobson and the foundations of semiotics [Roman Jakobson e i fondamentati della semiotica] (Ponzio 2015) as well as the Roman OsipoviÄ Jakobson volume in the landmark Russian series The Philosophy of Russia in the first half of the 20th Century [Filosofija Rossii pervoj poloviny XX veka] (Avtonomova, Baran & Ć Äedrina 2017). Finally, the last few of years have brought us new editions of Jakobson’s short writings and letters:[1] first, an Anthology of Roman Jakobsonâs engaged writings [AngaĆŸovanĂĄ ÄĂtanka Romana Jakobsona] (ed. Toman 2017), followed by his extensive correspondence with Claude LĂ©vi-Strauss in Correspondance 1942â1982 (ed. Loyer & Maniglier 2018), and now the Russian philologist’s epistolary exchanges with Danish phonologist Eli Fischer-JĂžrgensen in From the early years of phonology (Bank Jensen & DâOttavi 2020).
Beyond bearing witness to Jakobsonâs continued relevance, these publications highlight together some interesting features of the current state and scope of research on his work and life. A very encouraging sign, on the one hand, is that this research is being carried out by a new generation of scholars (along, of course, with a few senior Jakobson experts), whose interests and specialisations are decidedly interdisciplinary. Among the editors of the above-mentioned volumes, one finds not only linguists and historians of the language sciences, but also literary theorists, philosophers, anthropologists, semioticians and historians proper. The international, multilingual nature of the research into Jakobson’s work and legacy is another heartening aspect, especially given the fact that the various national and linguistic research contexts seem quite porous and aware of each other (many scholars are active cross-linguistically in several of these contexts). Further, one is struck not only by the sheer amount of new material published for the first time, but also by the prevalent role that the task of editing unpublished sources still takes up in comparison to the share of critical or interpretative studies of Jakobson’s ideas. As many researchers are happy to point out (Sorokina 2018, Testenoire 2019, D’Ottavi 2020), much more archival, edition and translation work awaits, be it in relation to the Jakobson Papers at MIT, to relevant archives in Moscow and Prague or to the many significant articles still only available in Russian, Czech or even Polish. Read more ›
In this interview, we talk to Floris Solleveld about the character of linguistic research in the 19th century.
Read more ›
Historiographia Linguistica 47-1. 2020. Amsterdam : Benjamins. 195 p. ISSN 0302-5160
Publisher’s webpage
Table of contents
Articles:
Manuel Sartori – Une cause et ses raisons dâĂȘtre Solution latine Ă un problĂšme de terminologie arabe.
Marco Spreafico – Diglossia and language ideology Petrarch on linguistic variation and differentiation.
Floris Solleveld – Expanding the comparative view: Humboldtâs Ăber die Kawi-Sprache and its language materials.
Read more ›Proposal submission deadline: 15 March 2021
This conference proposes to address, from a historical and/or an epistemological point of view, the ways in which Asian languages have been documented and described. âAsiaâ is used here in the wide sense which the French SociĂ©tĂ© asiatique gives to it, that is to say as designating an area going from the Maghreb to the Far East.
Conference languages: English, French, German, Italian or Spanish.
Further information at the SHESL website in English and French.
Chief Juan Datahan (â ) in front of a chart showing Eskayan ancestors labelled in the Eskayan script.
Piers Kelly
University of New England
In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the study of writing systems. Much of the new impetus has come from linguists investigating the interactions between graphic structure and linguistic structure. Yet practitioners hailing from classics, archaeology, anthropology and elsewhere are examing writing as a social as much as a linguistic phenomenon. These developments have not been universally welcomed. In his introduction to An exploration of writing (2018), Peter Daniels wrote that âarea specialists seem to have abandoned questions of how writing relates to language in favor of how writing relates to society. I find this move to be premature: the comparative and typological exploration of the connections between writing and language is far from completed [âŠ]â (Daniels 2018, 5). Here I want to lend weight to Danielsâ observation that a perceptible shift in focus has been unfolding in the study of writing systems, and to agree that we are far from having exhausted traditional grapholinguistic questions. What I reject, however, is the assumption that the social realities of writing are of secondary importance to linguistic analysis, or that a synthesis cannot be imagined until weâve sorted out the nuts and bolts of how writing systems work.
As it happens, anthropologists and archaeologists were once seriously invested in the relationship of writing to society, a relationship that was (unfortunately) theorised and systematised to support 19th-century social evolutionist theory. While this progressivist paradigm has long been discredited, it is only recently that researchers have returned to the social dimension of writing with fresh eyes, better information and new theoretical insights. In this blog post I want to try to make sense of this positive moment and to try to chart a way forward.
Read more ›
